The Journal
AI & Creativity

The creative stack we actually use in 2026

Which tools earn their seat at the table, which are quietly gathering dust, and what we are still missing.

SI

Sasha Iversen

Head of Production

·January 30, 2026·9 min read

The stack that survived

Eighteen months ago our production floor tried 41 AI tools. Today, 8 remain. Here is what earned the seat.

  • Writing and research. Long-context LLMs for synthesis, first drafts of long-form, and research extraction. We do not let them write final copy for clients.
  • Design ideation. Image models for thumbnail-level concept exploration, never for finished assets.
  • Video roughs. Generative video for previz and mood, handed to a human editor for finish.
  • Edit assistants. Voice-to-text, scene detection, color matching.
  • Ops. Meeting notes, transcript search, internal knowledge base.

The tools we quietly dropped

  • Full-stack "agent" platforms that claimed to replace a team.
  • Image tools optimized for portraiture at the expense of brand control.
  • Anything priced per-seat in a way that didn’t scale to 80 people.

What we are still missing

A production-grade generative tool that a creative director can hand to a client and not flinch. The gap between "looks great in a thumbnail" and "looks great in a 48-sheet poster" is still enormous, and it is the one gap we still cannot close with AI alone.

That gap is why we still hire humans.

#ai#tools#production